What Pakistanis Are Missing on Facebook

A week after the Lahore High Court ordered the ban of Facebook, I finally got the opportunity to see firsthand what is on the site.  I arrived in Afghanistan early this morning in preparation for the country’s peace jirga, and what I discovered on Facebook surprised me.

Via http://www.facebook.com/fightfirewithbeauty (Callligrapher @ deviantART)

I did a detailed search for the various spellings of the Prophet’s name and found seven groups in support of the controversial page that encouraged users to draw Muhammad.  A total of nearly 5,000 people had “Liked” the various pages.  On the other hand, there were almost double the number of groups in protest with more than 34,000 supporters.

In the spirit of full disclosure:  I did not individually check to see if people had “Liked” multiple groups or if each supporter was in fact a real live person (if you are so inclined and have the time, be my guest).  But I think it’s interesting that in its efforts to block the so-called “objectionable” pages on Facebook, the Pakistani government actually is blocking more pages that sympathize with its position.

The day before leaving Islamabad, I interviewed several young Pakistanis in the market about a variety of issues, including the Internet restrictions.  They were all very supportive of the Facebook ban and wanted the website to restrict any material that they considered offensive to Muslims.  However, they disagreed that YouTube should be totally banned because they said it had some good material on it.

Authorities unblocked YouTube this evening in Pakistan.  My colleagues there say they spoke earlier in the day with Wahaj-us-Siraj, a representative with the Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan.  He said he was surprised with the dramatic increase during the past week in user complaints about the restrictions on YouTube.

The popular video-sharing site is a prime example of the double-edged sword of the Internet.  For instance, you can view Koranic lessons on YouTube that explain and promote Islam as a religion of peace, or you can view the videos of Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni American who preaches violence against Americans in the name of Islam.  Both sides are present for the user to decide on whether to watch or not.

I discussed that double-edged sword analogy with the young Pakistanis in the market.  I applied it to Facebook by telling them about a Karachi-based non-governmental organization that solicits donations of blood to help alleviate hospital shortages.  A representative with the group told VOA that they collect at least 6,000 units of blood each month.  The group uses Facebook because it is popular in Pakistan, and it provides a cheap form of advertising.  In fact, the group faced criticism for speaking publicly against the Facebook ban, saying people can use Facebook for noble pursuits and that an advertising alternative would take a long time and people need blood now.  My interviewees for the most part still strongly supported the Facebook ban, and one even said that the NGO in Karachi should find other online means to promote its cause.

In my searching of Facebook, I discovered a group that takes a different approach against “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day.”  The group is called “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day – May 20th, 2010:  The Response!!!,” and it boasted 807 supporters at the time of this posting.  The group advocates drawing the Prophet’s name in calligraphy, and its page description had this to say:

…I have no intention of boycotting Facebook on May the 20th. Instead I intend to do exactly what the title of the page says, and draw the Prophet… The Prophet’s name has always been a favourite for Islamic artists of any era, and it is my suggestion that if these people want to draw the Prophet, then let us give them what they want, but on our terms, using our art. And I suggest we one up them; we will draw the Prophet indeed; we will sketch his teachings on the canvas of our lives; and paint his pursuit for justice with common sense, logic and rationality. We will show the world just a glimmer of his persona, because whilst it is perhaps true that nothing will ever aspire to the true splendour of his nature, there is certainly no harm in trying. Let us indulge the whims of the ignorant, and at the same time find joy in the creation of beauty.

A non-Muslim friend of mine in the United States said that as an outsider looking in, it looks like the Pakistani government acted prematurely in issuing its blanket ban on Facebook.  She said she believed the government didn’t give people enough credit to make their own response, and in the end, missed out on an opportunity to see freedom of expression in action.  What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  1. Lionheart’s avatar

    1) If freedom of speech is ABSOLUTE..Then European nations should repeal those laws that makes “Questioning the myth of Holocaust” as CRIMNAL OFFENSE..

    2)As recently this year France passed a law which makes “questioning the myth of armenain genocide” as CRIMNAL offense!!

    3) So it is not FREEDOM of speech they are fighting for….Its Islam they are fighting with

    4) Every human being believes in some ABSTRACT value for which he/she is ready to sacrifice his/her life.

    5) For West that abstract value is MAND MADE State boundaries..if some one invades that boundary..one has right to kills the invaders.

    6). For Muslims that abstract value is Islam..if you invades, Muslims are ready to sacrifice their life.

  2. yogi-one’s avatar

    I think the author’s point is valid. The Pakistani government would have looked stronger if it allowed the site because it overwhelmingly drew objections. Thus, the Pakistanis government could have just said -”look this proves that Pakistanis CHOOSE to respect the Prophet.” Instead it now appears to the international community that Islam is being rammed down your throats by the government.

    The tragedy is that it is not true. The government had the truth on their side this time, but they acted as if they had to cover something up.

    In America, we allow dissenting websites as long as they don’t explicitly incite violence or incite people to break the law. The result is that the extremists end up looking stupid, so everyone ignores them.

    The government realizes that plays better in the government’s favor than appearing to be oppressive.

    The Pakistan government needs to consider that point of view also.

  3. Lateef’s avatar

    I think author is not aware of the fact that this ban was imposed by Lahore High Court because of a legal case and government of Pakistan or Punjab had nothing to do with it.
    I don’t know why media is saying that Pakistan has banned facebook whereas they should be saying that it was a court ruling and Facebook should approach to Lahore High Court for justification.
    I think it is a bold step to show to the people outside and inside Pakistan that Pakistani courts are independent of Government (unlike in US where government wins in all cases in their Supreme Court, like unlimited corporate funding case etc).
    Unfortunately Pakistani media did not do their job in promoting a just image of Pakistani judiciary through this ruling.

  4. Infidel’s avatar

    Lateef,

    The US government doesn’t win all supreme court cases, the particular one you mentioned – on corporate funding – was lost by the Obama administration.

    It helps to know what you’re talking about before making such ridiculous assertions .

    Also, there’s nothing to be proud of regarding the Pakistani supreme court. If it showed that its’ independent of government, it also showed that it’s in agreement with or not independence of the population, pretty much legislating from the bench. Particularly laughable and embarrassing legislation too.

  5. Lateef’s avatar

    Infidel,

    It would have been better if you’d have concentrated on the blog instead of my comment.

    Regarding the Corporate funding case, Obama just said that he didn’t like the ruling but he himself raised a lot of money through private funding. So if you don’t know who really will get benefit of that then I can only feel sorry about your ignorance.

    Secondly if this court decision is ‘laughable’ then Facebook should have guts to challenge it in court which unfortunately they haven’t done so far.

    Since it is a Pakistani court ruling and it is about Islam so the west can’t swallow it right?