Controversy

You are currently browsing the archive for the Controversy category.

A week after the Lahore High Court ordered the ban of Facebook, I finally got the opportunity to see firsthand what is on the site.  I arrived in Afghanistan early this morning in preparation for the country’s peace jirga, and what I discovered on Facebook surprised me.

Via http://www.facebook.com/fightfirewithbeauty (Callligrapher @ deviantART)

I did a detailed search for the various spellings of the Prophet’s name and found seven groups in support of the controversial page that encouraged users to draw Muhammad.  A total of nearly 5,000 people had “Liked” the various pages.  On the other hand, there were almost double the number of groups in protest with more than 34,000 supporters.

In the spirit of full disclosure:  I did not individually check to see if people had “Liked” multiple groups or if each supporter was in fact a real live person (if you are so inclined and have the time, be my guest).  But I think it’s interesting that in its efforts to block the so-called “objectionable” pages on Facebook, the Pakistani government actually is blocking more pages that sympathize with its position.

The day before leaving Islamabad, I interviewed several young Pakistanis in the market about a variety of issues, including the Internet restrictions.  They were all very supportive of the Facebook ban and wanted the website to restrict any material that they considered offensive to Muslims.  However, they disagreed that YouTube should be totally banned because they said it had some good material on it.

Authorities unblocked YouTube this evening in Pakistan.  My colleagues there say they spoke earlier in the day with Wahaj-us-Siraj, a representative with the Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan.  He said he was surprised with the dramatic increase during the past week in user complaints about the restrictions on YouTube.

The popular video-sharing site is a prime example of the double-edged sword of the Internet.  For instance, you can view Koranic lessons on YouTube that explain and promote Islam as a religion of peace, or you can view the videos of Anwar al-Awlaki, the Yemeni American who preaches violence against Americans in the name of Islam.  Both sides are present for the user to decide on whether to watch or not.

I discussed that double-edged sword analogy with the young Pakistanis in the market.  I applied it to Facebook by telling them about a Karachi-based non-governmental organization that solicits donations of blood to help alleviate hospital shortages.  A representative with the group told VOA that they collect at least 6,000 units of blood each month.  The group uses Facebook because it is popular in Pakistan, and it provides a cheap form of advertising.  In fact, the group faced criticism for speaking publicly against the Facebook ban, saying people can use Facebook for noble pursuits and that an advertising alternative would take a long time and people need blood now.  My interviewees for the most part still strongly supported the Facebook ban, and one even said that the NGO in Karachi should find other online means to promote its cause.

In my searching of Facebook, I discovered a group that takes a different approach against “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day.”  The group is called “Everybody Draw Mohammad Day – May 20th, 2010:  The Response!!!,” and it boasted 807 supporters at the time of this posting.  The group advocates drawing the Prophet’s name in calligraphy, and its page description had this to say:

…I have no intention of boycotting Facebook on May the 20th. Instead I intend to do exactly what the title of the page says, and draw the Prophet… The Prophet’s name has always been a favourite for Islamic artists of any era, and it is my suggestion that if these people want to draw the Prophet, then let us give them what they want, but on our terms, using our art. And I suggest we one up them; we will draw the Prophet indeed; we will sketch his teachings on the canvas of our lives; and paint his pursuit for justice with common sense, logic and rationality. We will show the world just a glimmer of his persona, because whilst it is perhaps true that nothing will ever aspire to the true splendour of his nature, there is certainly no harm in trying. Let us indulge the whims of the ignorant, and at the same time find joy in the creation of beauty.

A non-Muslim friend of mine in the United States said that as an outsider looking in, it looks like the Pakistani government acted prematurely in issuing its blanket ban on Facebook.  She said she believed the government didn’t give people enough credit to make their own response, and in the end, missed out on an opportunity to see freedom of expression in action.  What do you think?

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

I’m not in the habit of referencing 1980’s U.S. power ballads in my blogs, but after speaking with friends and colleagues with me in Pakistan, the chorus of Glam metal band Cinderella’s “Don’t Know What You Got (Till It’s Gone)” comes to mind after going a few days without Facebook or YouTube.  (I automatically started to link to the YouTube video of the song for those who have never heard it, but Firefox was kind enough to remind me that Oops!… cannot connect.  Ironically though, you can hear the song at the beginning of this episode of “South Park.”)

On May 19th, Pakistan’s Lahore High Court ruled that the country’s Internet service providers needed to block Facebook until the end of the month, following a petition by an Islamic lawyers group in protest of a page encouraging users to draw the Prophet Muhammad.  (Click here for the story.)  From there, I think the progression of the court order’s implementation is interesting.

At 1:49 am on May 20th, I awoke to a SMS from my mobile carrier saying:

Dear Blackberry Customer:  BB Services are being suspended in lieu of LHC order to block Facebook due to blasphemous content to comply with PTA [Pakistan's telecommunication regulator] instructions.

I groggily checked my phone:  No email.  No instant messenging.  No web access.

Later that morning, I heard a PTA official say they had closed more than 450 websites, and I discovered:  No Wikipedia.  No Flickr.  No WordPress access.  And eventually, no YouTube.  (My Twitter account still worked though to my surprise.)

I spoke with Wahaj-us-Siraj, a representative with the Internet Service Providers Association of Pakistan.  He said they had only received orders to close Facebook and YouTube, and many sites had been closed accidentally.  He said they were working to unblock them after customer complaints.  (Interestingly enough, Siraj acknowledged that sites showing pornography were still accessible in Pakistan mainly because no one was protesting them in the media.)

He said that initially, PTA expanded the ban from Facebook to somewhere between 20 and 30 video links on YouTube because material it considered objectionable had spread there.  However, because PTA discovered that the number of videos was increasing, it ordered a complete shutdown of the popular video-sharing site.  (It is not clear how long the block on YouTube will remain.  PTA says if the site removes the videos in question, it will lift the ban.)

Siraj said up to 3.5 million users regularly use Facebook in Pakistan, and he estimated that the numbers are about the same for YouTube.  He said online traffic to these sites account for about a quarter of Pakistan’s total traffic on the Internet.

He added that while users are for the most part supportive of the ban on Facebook, the reaction to the ban on YouTube is mixed.

At 4:31 pm that day, I received a new SMS from my mobile carrier saying:

Dear Customer:  Blackberry Services have been restored.  Facebook and sites with blasphemous content remain blocked.  We regret the inconvenience caused[.]

Late that evening, I discovered that while Wikipedia was unblocked, its entry for Muhammad was restricted.  (It has since been unblocked.)

The next day on May 21st, local media quoted PTA officials as saying about 1,000 websites were banned.  And while I did not receive confirmation that Twitter was one of those sites blocked, I have had trouble accessing it for the past couple of days.

I find it interesting that the Wikipedia entry on Muhammad had been restricted during this process, while the entry entitled “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” (complete with depictions of the Prophet as various household items) currently is available in Pakistan.  I also am surprised that the entry entitled “Depictions of Muhammad” — which includes the uncensored South Park image of the Prophet as well as a photo from Iranian artist Sooreh Hera showing two Iranian gay men in a sexually provocative position while wearing masks depicting Muhammad and his son-in-law Ali — currently is not blocked.

Pakistani officials have been very vocal, saying they are busy monitoring the Internet for what they call “objectionable” material.  Yet, the ban really only seems to target websites that are popular and frequently controversial in the Muslim World:  Facebook, YouTube and, judging from my sporadic access, Twitter.  As the Wikipedia entries show, there is plenty of “objectionable” material listed under easily searchable names.

Do you think these sites are being unfairly targeted?  (Pakistan has blocked YouTube in the past.)  And if the authorities must block entire websites because users are spreading the material in question too fast, do you think Pakistan could — or even should — block all Internet access?  It may seem like an unlikely scenario, but judging by the PTA’s statements, it appears to be a possible outcome.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,